|
Specializing in Labor and Employment Law |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Over the past
10 months about 60% of my time has been spent in front of the United
States Department of Labor (DOL), representing clients who have between 2
and 30 employees. This has been a humbling and time-consuming experience
for many of my clients that sometimes results in severe monetary
consequences for them. In addition, each client has a State Labor
Department that also must be complied with. (In California it is called
the Division of Labor Standards.) The DOL’s
aggressive sweep through employers is not just limited to small employers.
Last April, an Oregon jury found that Taco Bell managers doctored
timecards of more than 13,000 employees to reduce labor costs. Damages are
expected to run into the millions of dollars. The Oregon
verdict followed a February settlement in a California case in which the
company agreed to pay $9 million in overtime to 3,000 California Taco Bell
managers and assistant managers for misclassifying them as exempt salaried
employees (free from overtime) when, in fact, they were nonexempt salaried
employees who should have been receiving overtime wages. Mervyns, a
dry goods department store in California (sister company of Target
Department Stores), settled a wage claim for paying employees a weekly
salary as exempt employees (without overtime) when they were actually
nonexempt (with overtime) employees. That settlement was $11.3 million. The most
obvious violations the DOL discovers in a small company is the
misclassification of employees, inadequate employment compliance posters
(or no federal and state compliance posters in the workplace at all), and
the failure to keep accurate time records. As a result of these three
glaring violations, the DOL has the authority to assess large monetary
penalties and back pay for the prior two years to every employee who was
misclassified as being exempt from overtime wages. I guess the
most obvious question is, what would you do if your company received a
letter from the United States Department of Labor stating that an
investigator would be at the door in the next few days to talk to the
company’s employees and examine the company’s wage and hour records?
Worse, what if an investigator showed up unannounced and demanded to speak
with employees and to rifle through the company’s records? This article
addresses the DOL’s investigatory process and suggests ways to manage
liability in the face of an investigation. Does the
DOL Have the Right to Investigate?
The Wage and Hour Division of the DOL has the right to investigate a
company’s records and talk to employees about pay practices. Although
most investigators will notify an employer prior to starting an
investigation, such notice is not required. If the company is
investigated, you can expect the DOL to come to the facility, gather and
review company records, interview employees, and make a determination
about potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). If you
deny an investigator access to your company’s premises, he or she will
eventually gain access by subpoena. What
Triggers an Investigation? Complaints by
current or former employees can trigger an investigation. Recently
terminated or disgruntled employees initiate many of the investigations.
In addition, in the absence of a complaint, the DOL may simply select your
workplace for investigation. Although all employers are subject to
investigation, the DOL frequently undertakes targeted sweeps of employers
in particular industries. Should We
Contact an Attorney Upon Learning of an Investigation? It is
advisable to immediately contact an attorney with experience handling DOL
investigations. An experienced attorney will offer advice concerning the
technical and often confusing requirements of the FLSA and assist in
making important decisions during the investigation. Self-representation
during an investigation may lead to severe monetary damages by misstating
a company process or procedure as it would relate to employee
classifications and pay structures. What Is
the Role of the DOL Investigator, and How Should I Interact with That
Person? The DOL will
assign an investigator who will be your company’s main DOL contact
throughout the investigation. It is beneficial to establish a cooperative
relationship with the investigator from the beginning. Your company should
communicate to the investigator that, although it does not believe it has
violated the FLSA, it will work cooperatively with the investigator and,
if violations are found, do what it takes to come into compliance. (Of
course, if the company disagrees with the DOL’s findings, it should be
prepared to respectfully defend its position.) What Can
an Employer Do During an Investigation to Limit Its Potential Liability? •
Determine who will interact with the investigator. (A company
representative? An attorney?) •
Before providing any information or documents, determine the scope
of the investigation. (All locations? All employees?) •
Carefully review all documents for accuracy before submitting them
to the DOL. •
Consider submitting a detailed “position statement” setting
forth the company’s legal and factual support for its position. •
Train supervisors and managers on the pertinent issues so they are
prepared for questions from the DOL and employees. •
Consider interviewing employees prior to the DOL interviews to gain
accurate and thorough information. What if
the DOL Finds That My Company Has Violated the FLSA? If violations
are found, the DOL first will require that the company change its pay
practices so no additional violations occur. Once future compliance has
been promised, the DOL will require that the company pay any back wages
owed to current and/or former employees. The amount owed will depend on
the nature of the violations and the number of employees at issue. A
two-year statute of limitations applies to the recovery of back wages,
except that in the case of willful violations a three-year statute of
limitations applies. The DOL will state the amount of back wages it
believes are owed and will then give the company an opportunity to submit
its own calculation and supporting evidence. The DOL and employer then
typically enter into settlement discussions to reach a resolution. At this
point in the process, the company may submit an offer to settle the case
for an amount of money substantially less than the DOL is requesting.
Advice of counsel is recommended during these negotiations. What if My
Company Disagrees with the DOL’s Findings? If the
company disagrees with the DOL’s findings, it may refuse to comply with
the DOL’s orders. The DOL will then decide whether to file a lawsuit
seeking to enjoin the company from further violations and compel payment
of unpaid back wages. even if the DOL does not pursue the case, any
employee who believes he or she is owed money may file a private lawsuit. What Steps
Can My Company Take, Before an Investigation, to Limit Its Liability? Employers
should conduct self-audits to ensure compliance with the FLSA and State
employment laws. Before doing so, the company should consult with
employment counsel concerning the various legal requirements of the FLSA
and the company’s State; lack of knowledge is no defense to liability.
In general, the company should do the following: •
Review each employee’s actual job duties and classification as
exempt or nonexempt under the FLSA, and make adjustments as necessary. •
Update job descriptions regularly. For exempt positions, ensure
that job descriptions include duties that meet the “duties” test of
the applicable exemption. •
Review FLSA record-keeping requirements. Maintain updated and
accurate information. •
Prominently display the DOL’s required FLSA poster in the
workplace. •
Review rules regarding what is considered “working time” under
the FLSA and ensure that nonexempt employees accurately record hours
worked. •
Ensure correct calculation of overtime hours and compensation. •
Review state and federal child-labor laws. •
Periodically review the status of independent contractors to ensure
that they are correctly paid as independent contractors rather than
employees. •
Ensure that employees who complain of FLSA violations are not subject
to retaliation. Compliance with
both Federal and State wage and hour laws is a difficult but mandatory task.
The consequences for noncompliance can be severe and could result in large
monetary damages. While reviewing these laws personally or with the
appropriate advice of counsel, keep this rule in mind: Whether applying the
Federal Fair Labor Standards Act or your individual State Employment Laws to
your employment practices, the law most favorable to the employee is the law
that must be used. Here are some examples: •
The FLSA does not require overtime after 8 hours in a day but does
after 40 hours in a week. But if the State requires overtime after 8 hours
in any workday, then the employee receives overtime after 8 hours. •
The FLSA does not require rest breaks during the workday. But if the
State requires a rest break for every 4 hours worked and a meal break for
shifts longer than 5 hours, the employee receives both the rest and meal
break if the prescribed hours are exceeded. •
The FLSA requires a salaried exempt-from-overtime employee to have
control (defined as being able to hire or terminate a minimum of 2
employees) over other employees. If the State does not have laws pertaining
to a salaried employee receiving overtime, then, if your salaried employee
lacks the FLSA-defined level of control, the FLSA applies to the
classification and the salaried employee receives overtime. In short,
employee wage and hour laws are a current issue requiring the attention of
any employer, no matter the number of employees they have or independent
contractors they retain. Don’t be caught unprepared. About the author ABSSI / Industry Focus / July 2001 Copyright © 2001 RP Consultants All rights reserved
[ Home | Company Info | Published Articles | Services | Feedback ] |